ABEV vs AGCC vs TAP Stock Comparison

Ambev, Agencia Comercial Spirits and Molson Coors Beverage Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ABEV Ambev S.A.
$2.84 -2.4% 1M +29.7% 1Y
Market cap
$44.76B
P/E
14.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$16.68B
Div. yield
1.06%
Brewers Consumer Staples
7 wins
TAP Molson Coors Beverage Co
$40.02 +11.3% 1M -11.9% 1Y
Market cap
$8.67B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$12.93B
Div. yield
4.77%
Brewers Consumer Staples
4 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Ambev leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Ambev 7, Molson Coors Beverage 4, Agencia Comercial Spirits 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionABEVAGCCTAPLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $44.76B $503.62M $8.67B ABEV
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 14.1x 382.6x -3.3x ABEV
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 14.9x — 9.0x TAP
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +4.1% — -2.6% ABEV
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 18.8% — -17.8% ABEV
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 25.3% — -12.5% ABEV
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.4x — -3.2x TAP
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 1.06% 0.00% 4.77% TAP
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +29.7% +227.0% -11.9% AGCC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +1.2%/yr — -1.7%/yr ABEV
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 36.0% 107.6% 29.7% TAP
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 75/100 — 39/100 ABEV

Percentile Scorecard

ABEVAGCCTAP

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisABEVAGCCTAP
Valuation 87 #3 of 16 0 #16 of 16 73 #5 of 16
Growth 36 #8 of 12 – 0 #12 of 12
Profitability 100 #1 of 11 – 40 #7 of 11
Financial Health 75 #5 of 17 38 #11 of 17 44 #10 of 17
Shareholder Returns – – –
Overall 75 – 39
  • ABEV ranked among 19 companies in Beverages
  • AGCC ranked among 19 companies in Beverages
  • TAP ranked among 19 companies in Beverages

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodABEVAGCCTAPSPY
1 month -2.4%-2.5%+11.3% -0.8%
3 months -7.8%-4.0%-2.7% +3.5%
6 months -1.7%-11.9%-6.0% +7.0%
Year to date +15.0%+50.1%-14.3% +12.2%
1 year +29.7%+227.0%-11.9% +13.0%
3 years +16.4%—-29.5% +86.3%
3 years, per year +5.2%—-11.0% +23.1%
5 years +6.0%—-8.3% +68.6%
5 years, per year +1.2%—-1.7% +11.0%
10 years -54.3%—-62.3% +258.0%
10 years, per year -7.5%—-9.3% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureABEVAGCCTAPSPY
Volatility, 1Y 36.0%107.6%29.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 37.3%98.6%32.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.461.20-0.26 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.822.11-0.40 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -46.2%-47.7%-49.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -17.2%-38.9%-26.4% -1.8%
52-week high $3.43$23.96$54.38 $779.14
52-week low $2.18$4.30$35.96 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleABEVAGCCTAP
P/E now vs peer median 14.1xmedian 30.2x 382.6xmedian 30.2x -3.3xmedian 30.2x
P/S now vs peer median 2.7xmedian 1.5x 81.1xmedian 1.5x 0.7xmedian 1.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 7.3xmedian 15.0x —median 15.0x -8.1xmedian 15.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 7.4xmedian 17.8x -67.2xmedian 17.8x 6.5xmedian 17.8x
P/B now vs peer median 2.6xmedian 1.3x 51.0xmedian 1.3x 0.8xmedian 1.3x
PEG now vs peer median 4.09median 1.70 —median 1.70 0.01median 1.70

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsABEVAGCCTAP
Revenue $16.68B – $12.93B
Gross profit $8.66B – $4.10B
Operating income $4.53B – -$2.52B
Net income $3.16B – -$2.34B
Free cash flow $6.02B – $1.33B
EPS (diluted) $0.20 – $-12.29
Cash & equivalents $3.21B $15.82M $2.13B
Total debt $2.67B $24.96M $7.71B
Shares (diluted) 15.68B – 187.70M
Enterprise value $30.16B $487.79M $4.50B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricABEVAGCCTAP
P/E 14.1x 382.6x -3.3x
P/FCF 7.4x -67.2x 6.5x
P/Operating cash flow 8.5x – 4.4x
P/S 2.7x 81.1x 0.7x
P/B 2.6x 51.0x 0.8x
P/Tangible book 3.0x 51.3x -5.7x
EV/EBITDA 7.3x – -8.1x
EV/EBIT 9.4x – -5.7x
EV/Revenue 2.5x – 1.1x
EV/FCF 7.0x – 10.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 8.0x – 7.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 4.09 – 0.01

Growth

14 metrics
MetricABEVAGCCTAP
Revenue growth (1Y) 4.1% – -2.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 1.4% – -1.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 4.9% – -6.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 2.7% – 1.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) 13.0% – -256.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 9.5% – -94.9%
Net income growth (1Y) 19.2% – -318.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 3.6% – -307.5%
EPS growth (1Y) -14.2% – -338.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 3.5% – -307.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 14.3% – 20.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 9.6% – 4.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 11.2% – 38.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 4.9% – 5.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricABEVAGCCTAP
Gross margin 51.9% – 31.7%
EBITDA margin 34.6% – -13.6%
Operating margin 27.1% – -19.5%
Pretax margin 23.1% – -21.3%
Net margin 18.8% – -17.8%
FCF margin 36.1% – 10.3%
Operating cash flow margin 31.5% – 15.3%
Return on equity 18.4% – -22.9%
Return on assets 11.7% – -10.1%
Return on invested capital 25.3% – -12.5%
Return on capital employed 23.5% – -13.9%
Asset turnover 0.6x – 0.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.7x – -0.8x
Stock comp / revenue 0.5% – 0.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricABEVAGCCTAP
Debt / assets 4.1% 88.5% 31.6%
Debt / equity 0.1x 2.5x 0.7x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.4x – -3.2x
Debt / FCF 0.2x – 5.8x
Liabilities / assets 35.7% 65.0% 57.7%
Equity / assets 64.3% 35.0% 42.3%
Interest coverage 5.7x – –
Current ratio 1.0x 1.5x 0.9x
Quick ratio 0.6x 1.2x 0.6x
Cash ratio 0.5x 0.9x 0.4x
Altman Z-score 4.09 – 0.87

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricABEVAGCCTAP
Dividend yield 1.1% – 4.8%
Net buyback yield 1.2% – 6.4%
Shareholder yield 2.2% 0.0% 11.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusABEVAGCCTAP
Forward P/E 14.9xFY2026 – 9.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.19FY2026 – $4.43FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +5.6%FY2026 – -18.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +15.8% – +3.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year $18.71BFY2026 – $10.74BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +8.2%FY2026 – -3.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +0.1% – -1.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersABEVAGCCTAP
Held by institutions 6.7% – 100.0%
Institutions holding 403 – 617
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.9% – +12.2%
Institutions buying 199 – 340
Institutions selling 131 – 196
Buyers to sellers 1.52 – 1.73

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ABEVAGCCTAP
ABEV 1.00 0.03 0.27
AGCC 0.03 1.00 0.04
TAP 0.27 0.04 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ABEV, AGCC and TAP?

Ambev (ABEV) is the largest by market capitalisation: Ambev (ABEV) $44.76B, Agencia Comercial Spirits (AGCC) $503.62M, Molson Coors Beverage (TAP) $8.67B.

Which stock is cheaper, ABEV, AGCC and TAP?

Ambev (ABEV) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Ambev (ABEV) 14.1x, Agencia Comercial Spirits (AGCC) 382.6x, Molson Coors Beverage (TAP) -3.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, Molson Coors Beverage (TAP) is cheapest (Ambev (ABEV) 14.9x, Molson Coors Beverage (TAP) 9.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Ambev (ABEV) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Ambev (ABEV) +4.1%, Molson Coors Beverage (TAP) -2.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Ambev (ABEV) has the highest net margin (Ambev (ABEV) 18.8%, Molson Coors Beverage (TAP) -17.8%). On return on invested capital, Ambev (ABEV) leads (Ambev (ABEV) 25.3%, Molson Coors Beverage (TAP) -12.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Agencia Comercial Spirits (AGCC) returned the most: Ambev (ABEV) +29.7%, Agencia Comercial Spirits (AGCC) +227.0%, Molson Coors Beverage (TAP) -11.9%. Over five years, Ambev (ABEV) compounded fastest (Ambev (ABEV) +1.2%/yr, Molson Coors Beverage (TAP) -1.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Molson Coors Beverage (TAP) has the highest dividend yield: Ambev (ABEV) 1.06%, Agencia Comercial Spirits (AGCC) 0.00%, Molson Coors Beverage (TAP) 4.77%. Agencia Comercial Spirits (AGCC) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Molson Coors Beverage (TAP) has been the steadiest (Ambev (ABEV) 36.0%, Agencia Comercial Spirits (AGCC) 107.6%, Molson Coors Beverage (TAP) 29.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ABEV, AGCC and TAP?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Ambev (ABEV) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.