Cleanspark, Inc. (CLSKW) Stock Analysis and Metrics

Cleanspark

NASDAQ: CLSKW

$0.32 ▲ +0.05 (+20.95%)

At close: Jul 14, 2026 · 3:56 PM UTC

Financial Ratios

ROIC (Qtr)0.00

Total Debt (Qtr)1.79 Bn

Add ratio to table…

About

CleanSpark, Inc. is a data center developer that until recently focused exclusively on bitcoin mining. It independently owns leases and operates a large portfolio of data centers and power assets across the United States with locations in Georgia Tennessee Mississippi and Wyoming for a total contracted power capacity of approximately 1,027 megawatts as of September 30 2025. The company intends to continue growth in these regions and is actively developing plans for additional capacity in these states and other domestic regions. CleanSpark designs its infrastructure to efficiently profitably and responsibly secure and support both bitcoin mining and AI and HPC workloads. It continuously analyses its portfolio and pipeline of potential new developments and expansions of existing sites to identify opportunities for maximum return on investment which may include bitcoin mining AI and HPC hosting and leasing or a combination of both. The company cultivates trust and transparency among its employees and the communities where it operates. Through CleanSpark and its wholly owned subsidiaries it has operated in the bitcoin mining sector since December 2020. It previously had an independent bitcoin mining operation in Massena New York subject to a hosting agreement that operated 50 megawatts which expired on December 31 2024.

Bitcoin mining has historically been the principal revenue generating activity for CleanSpark. The company provides computing power to a single mining pool operator and receives bitcoin rewards consisting of newly issued coins and transaction fees as variable consideration. CleanSpark sells bitcoin from time to time to support operations and strategic growth and may use bitcoin as collateral for lending arrangements. In April 2025 the company launched an in house trading function and began entering bitcoin linked derivative contracts to hedge price volatility and generate liquidity for core operating activities. It also uses a substantial portion of the bitcoin it mines to fund its operations and capital expenditures. For the fiscal year ended September 30 2025 CleanSpark mined approximately 7,873 bitcoins net of mining pool fees representing a decrease of 11 percent compared to the prior year. In addition CleanSpark is developing its AI and HPC hosting business which will generate revenue from leasing data center capacity to hyperscale cloud providers AI providers and other technology companies.

The company operates through the following segments: Bitcoin Mining and AI and HPC Hosting.

• CleanSpark's Bitcoin Mining segment owns leases and operates data centers and power assets in Georgia Tennessee Mississippi and Wyoming with a total contracted power capacity of approximately 1,027 megawatts as of September 30 2025. The segment delivers an average hashrate of about 45.6 exahash per second peaking near 50 exahash per second and operates roughly 241,934 mining machines with an average age of about fifteen months and an average energy efficiency of 16.7 watts per terahash. It supplies its computing power to a sole mining pool operator under a terminable contract and earns bitcoin rewards that are sold to fund operations or used as collateral and in the fiscal year ended September 30 2025 the segment mined approximately 7,873 bitcoins net of pool fees.

• The AI and HPC Hosting segment leverages the company's power optimization land acquisition engineering operations and construction expertise to develop portions of its sites for AI and HPC hosting and leasing to hyperscale cloud providers AI providers and other technology companies. CleanSpark added a Senior Vice President of AI Data Centers in October 2025 and is working with Submer to evaluate future collaboration for next generation AI infrastructure. The segment secured rights to approximately 271 acres in Austin County Texas and executed long term power supply agreements totaling 285 megawatts to support a new data center campus while also retaining the existing 620 megawatt platform in Georgia for retrofit and dual purpose compute deployment. It continues to explore additional property acquisitions and expansions to grow its AI and HPC capacity.

CleanSpark holds a notable position among North American bitcoin miners due to its substantial owned power capacity and large scale mining fleet. Its principal competitors in the bitcoin mining space include MARA Holdings Riot Platforms Core Scientific Bitfarms IREN Limited Cipher Mining and TeraWulf. In the emerging AI and HPC data center market it faces competition from established operators such as Equinix Digital Realty Trust CoreWeave and others. The company's competitive advantages stem from its deep expertise in energy management the high efficiency of its mining hardware and its proven ability to maintain high uptime across its owned and operated facilities. CleanSpark also leverages the bitcoin it mines as a store of value to finance growth and as collateral for borrowing and it collaborates with local communities to help stabilize energy usage and reduce power rates for residential customers.

CleanSpark's Bitcoin Mining segment derives its revenue from a single mining pool operator that compensates the company for providing computing power to the pool. The AI and HPC Hosting segment is in the process of building a customer base that will consist of hyperscale cloud providers AI enterprises and other technology companies seeking scalable and energy efficient data center capacity. No specific customer names are disclosed in the filing for either segment.

Investment Thesis

▲ Bull case

CleanSpark's strategic pivot toward AI and HPC infrastructure represents a significant hidden catalyst that the market is underestimating, despite limited discussion in recent earnings calls; the company has secured up to 890 MW of utility-grade power capacity in Houston and advanced its Sandersville site with an additional 122-acre parcel specifically for AI tenancy, positioning it to capitalize on the exploding demand for data center infrastructure driven by generative AI and cloud expansion, with management explicitly stating these assets are being funded from a position of strength using durable bitcoin mining cash flows, which suggests a self-reinforcing cycle where core operations finance long-term growth avenues without dilutive external capital; this dual-stream model—where bitcoin mining generates immediate cash flow and AI infrastructure monetizes assets over the long term—creates a uniquely resilient business framework that is rare in today's market and could unlock substantial shareholder value as AI infrastructure demand continues to outstrip supply, particularly in strategic regions like Texas and Georgia where power scarcity and regulatory favorability converge; the market appears to be valuing CleanSpark primarily as a bitcoin miner, ignoring the embedded optionality in its power and land portfolio, which could be worth significantly more if repurposed for AI/HPC tenancy, especially given the company's control of over 1.8 GW of power across the U.S., a scale that is increasingly difficult to assemble due to interconnection delays and permitting bottlenecks; the recent hiring of Ruben Sahakyan, a veteran with over $20 billion in advisory transactions across digital assets and infrastructure, as Senior Vice President of Finance further de-risks the commercialization effort by bringing deep expertise in capital markets, M&A, and financial structuring for large-scale infrastructure projects, signaling that the company is not just building assets but actively preparing to monetize them through sophisticated financial engineering and partnerships; this move, combined with progress in leasing and ERCOT approvals (like the 300 MW in Brazoria), indicates a deliberate, well-funded transition beyond mining that could redefine the company's growth trajectory and valuation multiple over the next 12–24 months, particularly as hyperscale AI tenants seek turnkey, power-secure sites—an area where CleanSpark is increasingly differentiated.

CleanSpark's strategic pivot toward AI and HPC infrastructure represents a significant hidden catalyst that the market is underestimating, despite limited discussion in recent earnings calls; the company has secured up to 890 MW of utility-grade power capacity in Houston and advanced its Sandersville site with an additional 122-acre parcel specifically for AI tenancy, positioning it to capitalize on the exploding demand for data center infrastructure driven by generative AI and cloud expansion, with management explicitly stating these assets are being funded from a position of strength using durable bitcoin mining cash flows, which suggests a self-reinforcing cycle where core operations finance long-term growth avenues without dilutive external capital; this dual-stream model—where bitcoin mining generates immediate cash flow and AI infrastructure monetizes assets over the long term—creates a uniquely resilient business framework that is rare in today's market and could unlock substantial shareholder value as AI infrastructure demand continues to outstrip supply, particularly in strategic regions like Texas and Georgia where power scarcity and regulatory favorability converge; the market appears to be valuing CleanSpark primarily as a bitcoin miner, ignoring the embedded optionality in its power and land portfolio, which could be worth significantly more if repurposed for AI/HPC tenancy, especially given the company's control of over 1.8 GW of power across the U.S., a scale that is increasingly difficult to assemble due to interconnection delays and permitting bottlenecks; the recent hiring of Ruben Sahakyan, a veteran with over $20 billion in advisory transactions across digital assets and infrastructure, as Senior Vice President of Finance further de-risks the commercialization effort by bringing deep expertise in capital markets, M&A, and financial structuring for large-scale infrastructure projects, signaling that the company is not just building assets but actively preparing to monetize them through sophisticated financial engineering and partnerships; this move, combined with progress in leasing and ERCOT approvals (like the 300 MW in Brazoria), indicates a deliberate, well-funded transition beyond mining that could redefine the company's growth trajectory and valuation multiple over the next 12–24 months, particularly as hyperscale AI tenants seek turnkey, power-secure sites—an area where CleanSpark is increasingly differentiated.

▼ Bear case

CleanSpark's reported financial performance masks deteriorating core profitability and growing balance sheet risks that the market is ignoring, particularly the sharp decline in adjusted EBITDA to negative $241.2 million in Q2 FY26 from negative $57.8 million in the prior year period, despite management's emphasis on balance sheet strength and working capital; this worsening operational trend is driven by soaring costs—including a 63% year-over-year increase in payroll expenses to $24.9 million and a 37% rise in general and administrative expenses to $16.1 million—coupled with collapsing bitcoin mining revenue, which fell 25% year-over-year to $136.4 million in Q2 FY26, indicating that the company's core revenue engine is weakening even as it expands its power portfolio, suggesting that growth in contracted capacity (now at 1.8 GW) is not translating into proportional utilization or profitability, with utilized MW stagnant at 808 MW despite significant GW under contract increases; the company's increasing reliance on non-core activities—such as derivatives trading, bitcoin collateral management, and call/put option strategies—introduces significant complexity and volatility, as evidenced by the $142.5 million loss on bitcoin collateral over the first six months of FY26, a stark reversal from the $42.5 million gain in the prior year period, highlighting that treasury management activities are becoming a drag rather than a boon and exposing the firm to counterparty and market risks that are not adequately disclosed in forward-looking statements; additionally, the accumulation of treasury stock at cost—now over $608 million, up from $145 million in September 2025—suggests aggressive share buybacks that may be propping up the stock price despite declining fundamentals, while the growing long-term debt of $1.788 billion (up from $644.6 million a year earlier) raises concerns about financial leverage, especially as interest expense more than doubled to $2.1 million in Q2 FY26 and the company remains dependent on third-party power providers and utility rate structures for expansion, leaving it vulnerable to regulatory shifts or grid constraints in key markets like ERCOT; finally, the limited discussion of integration risks tied to recent acquisitions and the dependency on successful deployment of new miners—amid rising bitcoin network difficulty and halving effects—further underscores that the company's growth strategy is execution-heavy and exposed to multiple unmitigated risks that could derail its AI infrastructure ambitions before they generate meaningful revenue.

CleanSpark's reported financial performance masks deteriorating core profitability and growing balance sheet risks that the market is ignoring, particularly the sharp decline in adjusted EBITDA to negative $241.2 million in Q2 FY26 from negative $57.8 million in the prior year period, despite management's emphasis on balance sheet strength and working capital; this worsening operational trend is driven by soaring costs—including a 63% year-over-year increase in payroll expenses to $24.9 million and a 37% rise in general and administrative expenses to $16.1 million—coupled with collapsing bitcoin mining revenue, which fell 25% year-over-year to $136.4 million in Q2 FY26, indicating that the company's core revenue engine is weakening even as it expands its power portfolio, suggesting that growth in contracted capacity (now at 1.8 GW) is not translating into proportional utilization or profitability, with utilized MW stagnant at 808 MW despite significant GW under contract increases; the company's increasing reliance on non-core activities—such as derivatives trading, bitcoin collateral management, and call/put option strategies—introduces significant complexity and volatility, as evidenced by the $142.5 million loss on bitcoin collateral over the first six months of FY26, a stark reversal from the $42.5 million gain in the prior year period, highlighting that treasury management activities are becoming a drag rather than a boon and exposing the firm to counterparty and market risks that are not adequately disclosed in forward-looking statements; additionally, the accumulation of treasury stock at cost—now over $608 million, up from $145 million in September 2025—suggests aggressive share buybacks that may be propping up the stock price despite declining fundamentals, while the growing long-term debt of $1.788 billion (up from $644.6 million a year earlier) raises concerns about financial leverage, especially as interest expense more than doubled to $2.1 million in Q2 FY26 and the company remains dependent on third-party power providers and utility rate structures for expansion, leaving it vulnerable to regulatory shifts or grid constraints in key markets like ERCOT; finally, the limited discussion of integration risks tied to recent acquisitions and the dependency on successful deployment of new miners—amid rising bitcoin network difficulty and halving effects—further underscores that the company's growth strategy is execution-heavy and exposed to multiple unmitigated risks that could derail its AI infrastructure ambitions before they generate meaningful revenue.

Peer Comparison

Companies in the Capital Markets

S.No.	Ticker	Company	Market Cap	P/E	P/S	Total Debt (Qtr)
1	MS	Morgan Stanley	330.70 Bn	0.00 Bn	4.50	119.83 Bn
2	GS	Goldman Sachs Group Inc	309.79 Bn	0.00 Bn	5.12	259.45 Bn
3	SCHW	Schwab Charles Corp	167.21 Bn	0.00 Bn	6.74	-
4	FUTU	Futu Holdings Ltd	111.36 Bn	85.66 Bn	82.13	0.01 Bn
5	HOOD	Robinhood Markets, Inc.	97.69 Bn	0.00 Bn	21.18	-
6	LPLA	LPL Financial Holdings Inc.	23.49 Bn	0.00 Bn	1.29	-
7	TW	Tradeweb Markets Inc.	21.59 Bn	0.00 Bn	9.99	-
8	CRCL	Circle Internet Group, Inc.	15.14 Bn	0.00 Bn	6.85	-

Research Tools

Developers

About

Investment Thesis

Business Combination Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Peer Comparison

Research Tools

Developers

About

Investment Thesis

Business Combination Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Peer Comparison

Create an account

Sign In

Reset Password