Jack In The Box (JACK) Debt Ratio (2009 - 2026)
Jack In The Box's quarterly Debt Ratio came in at 0.79 in Q2 2026, up 18.87% year-on-year from 0.67 in Q2 2025, and up 20.42% quarter-over-quarter from 0.66 in Q3 2025.
Jack In The Box has reported Debt Ratio for 18 years, with the latest figure at 0.79 in Q2 2026.
- For the quarter ending Q2 2026, Debt Ratio rose 18.87% year-over-year to 0.79; the trailing twelve-month figure through Apr 2026 stood at 0.79 (up 18.87% YoY), and the FY2025 full-year result was 0.66, up 3.56% from the prior year.
- Debt Ratio for Q2 2026 stood at 0.79, up from 0.66 in the prior quarter.
- The five-year high for Debt Ratio was 0.79 in Q2 2026, with the low at 0.58 in Q4 2023.
- Average Debt Ratio over 5 years is 0.64, with a median of 0.63 recorded in 2024.
- Year-over-year, Debt Ratio dropped 14.02% in 2022 and grew 18.87% in 2026.
- Tracing JACK's Debt Ratio over 5 years: stood at 0.63 in 2022, then retreated by 6.6% to 0.58 in 2023, then increased by 8.48% to 0.63 in 2024, then increased by 3.56% to 0.66 in 2025, then gained by 20.42% to 0.79 in 2026.
- The last three Debt Ratio figures came in at 0.79 (Q2 2026), 0.66 (Q3 2025), and 0.66 (Q3 2025), per Business Quant data.
Peer Comparison
| # | Company | Market Cap | Enterprise Value | Gross Profit (Qtr) | Debt Ratio (Qtr) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Starbucks | 110.27 Bn | 108.58 Bn | 9.40 Bn | 0.49 |
| 2 | Yum Brands | 40.90 Bn | 40.21 Bn | 1.38 Bn | 1.46 |
| 3 | Chipotle Mexican Grill | 39.62 Bn | 38.75 Bn | 2.61 Bn | - |
| 4 | Restaurant Brands International | 25.25 Bn | 25.79 Bn | 2.14 Bn | 0.53 |
| 5 | Darden Restaurants | 23.41 Bn | 23.17 Bn | 3.31 Bn | 0.02 |
| 6 | Yum China Holdings | 15.07 Bn | 13.64 Bn | 3.24 Bn | 0.00 |
| 7 | Texas Roadhouse | 11.59 Bn | 11.39 Bn | 1.40 Bn | 0.01 |
| 8 | Dominos Pizza | 10.51 Bn | 10.27 Bn | 464.51 Mn | 2.65 |
| 9 | Cava | 8.67 Bn | 8.28 Bn | 797.57 Mn | - |
| 10 | Jack In The Box | 260.00 Mn | 143.48 Mn | 226.88 Mn | 0.79 |
Historic Data
Download Data| Date | Value |
|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2026 | 0.79 |
| Sep 28, 2025 | 0.66 |
| Jul 6, 2025 | 0.66 |
| Apr 13, 2025 | 0.67 |
| Jan 19, 2025 | 0.62 |
| Sep 29, 2024 | 0.63 |
| Jul 7, 2024 | 0.63 |
| Apr 14, 2024 | 0.60 |
| Jan 21, 2024 | 0.61 |
| Oct 1, 2023 | 0.58 |
| Jul 9, 2023 | 0.60 |
| Apr 16, 2023 | 0.61 |
| Jan 22, 2023 | 0.63 |
| Oct 2, 2022 | 0.63 |
| Jul 10, 2022 | 0.64 |
| Apr 17, 2022 | 0.65 |
| Jan 23, 2022 | 0.73 |
| Oct 3, 2021 | 0.73 |
| Jul 4, 2021 | 0.71 |
| Apr 11, 2021 | 0.71 |
| Jan 17, 2021 | 0.72 |
| Sep 27, 2020 | 0.72 |
| Jul 5, 2020 | 0.73 |
| Apr 12, 2020 | 0.74 |
| Jan 19, 2020 | 0.76 |
| Sep 29, 2019 | 1.33 |
| Jul 7, 2019 | 1.22 |
| Apr 14, 2019 | 1.27 |
| Jan 20, 2019 | 1.27 |
| Sep 30, 2018 | 1.30 |
| Jul 8, 2018 | 1.13 |
| Apr 15, 2018 | 1.08 |
| Jan 21, 2018 | 0.95 |
| Oct 1, 2017 | 0.93 |
| Jul 9, 2017 | 0.94 |
| Apr 16, 2017 | 0.97 |
| Jan 22, 2017 | 0.83 |
| Oct 2, 2016 | 0.74 |
| Jul 3, 2016 | 0.69 |
| Apr 10, 2016 | 0.72 |
| Jan 17, 2016 | 0.62 |
| Sep 27, 2015 | 0.55 |
| Jul 5, 2015 | 0.52 |
| Apr 12, 2015 | 0.48 |
| Jan 18, 2015 | 0.45 |
| Sep 28, 2014 | 0.40 |
| Jul 6, 2014 | 0.41 |
| Apr 13, 2014 | 0.39 |
| Jan 19, 2014 | 0.32 |
| Sep 29, 2013 | 0.28 |
| Jul 7, 2013 | 0.28 |
| Apr 14, 2013 | 0.28 |
| Jan 20, 2013 | 0.29 |
| Sep 30, 2012 | 0.29 |
| Jul 8, 2012 | 0.31 |
| Apr 15, 2012 | 0.33 |
| Jan 22, 2012 | 0.34 |
| Oct 2, 2011 | 0.33 |
| Jul 10, 2011 | 0.32 |
| Apr 17, 2011 | 0.29 |
| Jan 23, 2011 | 0.27 |
| Oct 3, 2010 | 0.26 |
| Jul 4, 2010 | 0.26 |
| Sep 27, 2009 | 0.29 |